<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verifying PCB Footprints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryswblog.org/2009/11/04/verifying-pcb-footprints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/11/04/verifying-pcb-footprints/</link>
	<description>Merging modern software development with electrons and metal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/11/04/verifying-pcb-footprints/comment-page-1/#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=338#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s nice to know.  

But Altium is about $4,000 for commercial users, which is way too much for my budget (or my company&#039;s budget).  I&#039;m pretty sure some other PCB EDA tools have similar 3D capabilities, but I haven&#039;t had time to do the required research -- and unfortunately won&#039;t for quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nice to know.  </p>
<p>But Altium is about $4,000 for commercial users, which is way too much for my budget (or my company&#8217;s budget).  I&#8217;m pretty sure some other PCB EDA tools have similar 3D capabilities, but I haven&#8217;t had time to do the required research &#8212; and unfortunately won&#8217;t for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob LaMoreaux</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/11/04/verifying-pcb-footprints/comment-page-1/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob LaMoreaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=338#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>I do all that inside Altium Design. I add the Step model to the footprint, or create the body using their simple 3d bodies and then I can render the board and be sure everything fits. I can also use Alibre of such to create new step models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do all that inside Altium Design. I add the Step model to the footprint, or create the body using their simple 3d bodies and then I can render the board and be sure everything fits. I can also use Alibre of such to create new step models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/11/04/verifying-pcb-footprints/comment-page-1/#comment-4391</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=338#comment-4391</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done the 3D CAD method for a while -- at work, it&#039;s simple: I just give our ME a DXF of the layout, and all the part models, and he puts it all together, in SolidWorks, much faster than I could.  But I&#039;m enjoying learning how to do it by myself.

We do a rough model of the components in 3D to make sure everything should fit, then let our assembly tech put it all together -- he&#039;s good at figuring out the best layout.  Then we re-do our CAD model to match his arrangement.  And it&#039;s always good to leave a little extra space, for extra requirements that customers want added...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done the 3D CAD method for a while &#8212; at work, it&#8217;s simple: I just give our ME a DXF of the layout, and all the part models, and he puts it all together, in SolidWorks, much faster than I could.  But I&#8217;m enjoying learning how to do it by myself.</p>
<p>We do a rough model of the components in 3D to make sure everything should fit, then let our assembly tech put it all together &#8212; he&#8217;s good at figuring out the best layout.  Then we re-do our CAD model to match his arrangement.  And it&#8217;s always good to leave a little extra space, for extra requirements that customers want added&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/11/04/verifying-pcb-footprints/comment-page-1/#comment-4388</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=338#comment-4388</guid>
		<description>It took me an expensive mistake before I thought to do the printout trick, lol!

I have yet to try 3D cad for PCB design though. I use it a lot for mechanical assembly, and then 2D cad for things like electrical enclosure layout fit testing.  Maybe my next project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me an expensive mistake before I thought to do the printout trick, lol!</p>
<p>I have yet to try 3D cad for PCB design though. I use it a lot for mechanical assembly, and then 2D cad for things like electrical enclosure layout fit testing.  Maybe my next project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
