<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alibre&#8217;s $99 Deal Is Good for PCB Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/</link>
	<description>Merging modern software development with electrons and metal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-4392</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=331#comment-4392</guid>
		<description>For PCB modeling work, I think I like the direct modeling approach best (e.g. CoCreate, VX, KeyCreator, SpaceClaim) instead of the classic parametric approach (e.g. Alibre, SW, SE, Inventor).  But I need more experience before I can say that with conviction.  I also hope to take a deeper look at 3D in PCB EDA programs; I suspect it&#039;s not even close to what you can do with 3D MCAD, but, again,  I have to spend the time to find out, so don&#039;t hold your breath waiting for a post on this.

And, sometime I&#039;d like to play with motion simulation.  I&#039;m curious to see how much work it is to set up.  And, if I ever get my desktop CNC mill put together, then I&#039;ll need some kind of affordable CAM software (for solid modeling to gcode; I&#039;ll probably use the Linux EMC project to interpret gcode and control the mill).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For PCB modeling work, I think I like the direct modeling approach best (e.g. CoCreate, VX, KeyCreator, SpaceClaim) instead of the classic parametric approach (e.g. Alibre, SW, SE, Inventor).  But I need more experience before I can say that with conviction.  I also hope to take a deeper look at 3D in PCB EDA programs; I suspect it&#8217;s not even close to what you can do with 3D MCAD, but, again,  I have to spend the time to find out, so don&#8217;t hold your breath waiting for a post on this.</p>
<p>And, sometime I&#8217;d like to play with motion simulation.  I&#8217;m curious to see how much work it is to set up.  And, if I ever get my desktop CNC mill put together, then I&#8217;ll need some kind of affordable CAM software (for solid modeling to gcode; I&#8217;ll probably use the Linux EMC project to interpret gcode and control the mill).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=331#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>I ended up going with the &#039;Standard&#039; edition.  I really wanted SolidWorks or Inventor of course, but it was too expensive for my employer.  Sometimes I wish I&#039;d got the Pro for motion simulation, but it&#039;s not critical to any designs I&#039;ve done with it yet... motion would be more for eye candy for showing off a mechanism to people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ended up going with the &#8216;Standard&#8217; edition.  I really wanted SolidWorks or Inventor of course, but it was too expensive for my employer.  Sometimes I wish I&#8217;d got the Pro for motion simulation, but it&#8217;s not critical to any designs I&#8217;ve done with it yet&#8230; motion would be more for eye candy for showing off a mechanism to people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-4365</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=331#comment-4365</guid>
		<description>Yet another special offer: VX is offering &lt;a href=&quot;http://vxstore.vx.com/department/special-offers-4.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VX Innovator for $195&lt;/a&gt; (North America, India, Africa only) until August 31.  Innovator is also worth a look; for example, it looks like it has better surfacing abilities than Alibre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another special offer: VX is offering <a href="http://vxstore.vx.com/department/special-offers-4.cfm" rel="nofollow">VX Innovator for $195</a> (North America, India, Africa only) until August 31.  Innovator is also worth a look; for example, it looks like it has better surfacing abilities than Alibre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-4364</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=331#comment-4364</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using the free version of Eagle PCB; it&#039;s a good match for what I do.  For a full time PCB designer, Altium could be nice, especially after its recent price cut, but at about $4,000 it&#039;s way too much for my personal use (or for my job).  I&#039;m not interested in using illegal hacks.

Sometime I&#039;d like to look into Altium&#039;s 3D capabilities more (along with some other mid-range PCB software), although I doubt it&#039;s anywhere close to a real MCAD program.  Also, Altium is very FPGA-oriented and is pushing their unified design process (do your whole design in Altium).  I&#039;m a skeptic -- to put it briefly, just like with NI &amp; LabView, there is a lot more innovation going on outside their unified systems than inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the free version of Eagle PCB; it&#8217;s a good match for what I do.  For a full time PCB designer, Altium could be nice, especially after its recent price cut, but at about $4,000 it&#8217;s way too much for my personal use (or for my job).  I&#8217;m not interested in using illegal hacks.</p>
<p>Sometime I&#8217;d like to look into Altium&#8217;s 3D capabilities more (along with some other mid-range PCB software), although I doubt it&#8217;s anywhere close to a real MCAD program.  Also, Altium is very FPGA-oriented and is pushing their unified design process (do your whole design in Altium).  I&#8217;m a skeptic &#8212; to put it briefly, just like with NI &amp; LabView, there is a lot more innovation going on outside their unified systems than inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petar</title>
		<link>http://factoryswblog.org/2009/08/17/i-like-alibre-design-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>Petar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryswblog.org/?p=331#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>Can I ask a question: What PCB Software do you use. Most of this things that you need to do with MCAD can be done with Altium Designer: Importing STEP models on footprints, Importing Board shape from STEP and DXF, Importing shape of the case and checking it&#039;s interference with components and board...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I ask a question: What PCB Software do you use. Most of this things that you need to do with MCAD can be done with Altium Designer: Importing STEP models on footprints, Importing Board shape from STEP and DXF, Importing shape of the case and checking it&#8217;s interference with components and board&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
